Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Karl Larsen wrote:
Ah well, I wonder if you wound up with proper .iso files or were they
.iso.tmp? And it is not clear to me that jigdo is really working for Fedora
yet.
Karl
why do you keep doing this, karl? as far as i can tell, jigdo works
just fine, as others have verified, as long as you do the right thing.
the difference in the two files above is that, while jigdo is still
populating your ISO image, you'll have a .iso.tmp file. once it's
complete and there's nothing more to add, jigdo will verify that the
ISO image seems to be good, and will rename it to .iso.
in short, as long as jigdo is building the image and the file has a
suffix of .iso.tmp, it's *not* *finished* *yet*.
rday
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
Well rday it appears finished and I did rename it without the .tmp.
I was asking the other guy if he had the same thing.
It is a FACT that jigdo was not done but kept asking for another
location to get files from. But it made no sense so I used Ctrl-c to end it.
Since then I put the jigdo file on a DVD and it looks fine. I need
to install it and see if that works properly. Or have you done that?
The manual is coming along well and will send it to you when it
looks done.
Karl
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
PGP 4208 4D6E 595F 22B9 FF1C ECB6 4A3C 2C54 FE23 53A7
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
