On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Karl Larsen wrote: > Ah well, I wonder if you wound up with proper .iso files or were they > .iso.tmp? And it is not clear to me that jigdo is really working for Fedora > yet. > > Karl why do you keep doing this, karl? as far as i can tell, jigdo works just fine, as others have verified, as long as you do the right thing. the difference in the two files above is that, while jigdo is still populating your ISO image, you'll have a .iso.tmp file. once it's complete and there's nothing more to add, jigdo will verify that the ISO image seems to be good, and will rename it to .iso. in short, as long as jigdo is building the image and the file has a suffix of .iso.tmp, it's *not* *finished* *yet*. rday ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca ======================================================================== -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
