On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 19:24 +1030, Tim wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 17:57 +1100, Simon Slater wrote: > > I thought keeping it simple and just using entries in /etc/hosts > > for each was the way to start. So sendmail needs more, than that? > If addresses are static, I'd expect that to work, it has for me. Though > it's ages since I relied on hosts files, I use an internal DNS server, > now. > > You'd want your IP address associated with your fully-qualified domain > name (for that interface) and associated with any aliases that you use > with it as well. > > e.g. 192.168.1.12 mailserver.example.com mailserver > > That way, if your mail server starts up thinking that it's "mailserver" > *or* "mailserver.example.com" it finds its IP matches, and vice versa > (when it asks to find out the name associated with its IP, it gets told > the same answer). Generally it's the FQDN first, *then* aliases. > > The addresses should match what it thinks itself is, i.e. the address of > its interface, regardless of any external public addresses (e.g. the > external address is the address of your connection to the internet on > the other side of a router). > Soooo..., going back to kindergarten..., the names I put in /etc/hosts were made up to describe the box on a purely internal network. Should the names/aliases be something different? What would/would not conflict with public FQDN? -- Regards Simon -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
