On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 10:25 -0500, Todd Denniston wrote: > I wonder how many RFC's would be violated if list servers would have > the ability (list configuration item) to look at the emails sent to > it, and if an email had less than say a 1-5% (of a normalized form of > the email) difference to one of the list's own Digests (from the last > few weeks), either reject the email or only send the difference on to > the list, especially if subject email had the subject "Re: thislist > Digest, ThislistsVolIssuePolicy". You can certainly reject certain messages as being unwanted. I was thinking just the other day that I would have had replies to digests outright banned if the subject line wasn't changed and the message was a full quote reply. Bouncing it back with a rejection notice saying what was required for a post to be accepted. I'd be tempted to go further. Any "replies" lacking the in-reply-to and references headers to be rejected, too, for stuffing up threading. Tim... ex-BBS SysOp tyrant... -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr 2.6.23.1-10.fc7 i686 i386 Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7. Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
