On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 08:24 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > Tim wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:04 -0700, Craig White wrote: > >> OK normal setup would have NetworkManager start at 98 which of course > >> would be after ntpd (and most every other network service) > > > > Seems a rather bad way to organise the starting order, not having a > > network ready before services that need to use a network. > > > I am working on my first cup of coffee, so I may be way off base, > but isn't NetworkManager designed to manage connections when a user > logs in? My thinking is the late start is because the programmers > figured that it would not have anything to do until the user logs > in, and unlocks the "key vault" so that the wireless encryptions are > available. In this case, might it work better to use the network > service instead of NetworkManager to bring up the network? This may > be why NetworkManager runs in run level 5, and network runs in run > level 3? > > Note: I am writing this from a FC6 box, so I can not double check > the service names/startup time in F8. Would someone please double > check this? ---- I did double check it on F8 and NetworkManager is indeed chkconfig 98 2 meaning S98 and K02 I think your assessment is probably correct. I gathered from an earlier explanation that the 'Live CD' uses NetworkManager by default and thereby gather that an installation by a 'Live CD' would mimic that. Obviously that would cause a few issues - such as the one under discussion where ntpd starts before any network starts and I would think that a bugzilla entry to NetworkManager should restart any services such as ntpd upon establishing a network connection would be the end of discussion. Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
