On 02/12/2007, Konstantin Svist <fry.kun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> So how do I "fix" it? > >> I'm guessing something in the process of compilation of /usr/local > >> version... > >> > > > > In addition to not setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH is harmful ways, verify > > /etc/ld.so* and kill your stuff in /usr/local until you know what > > you're doing. > > > > Hmm, sure enough - /etc/ld.so.conf contains "/usr/local/lib" (and the > 64bit system doesn't) > > Is it supposed to be there? No, it isn't. Unless you desperately want it to be there. > If not, what could've added it? PEBKAC? > Is it safe to remove? It depends on how you've modified your system. > Judging from contents of files in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ it looks like every > [package/program/?] can define its own set of library paths. What's the > proper procedure for adding those? The default for Fedora is this: $ cat /etc/ld.so.conf include ld.so.conf.d/*.conf -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
