Michael Schwendt wrote:
On 01/12/2007, Konstantin Svist <fry.kun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On 01/12/2007, Konstantin Svist <fry.kun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
$ ldd /usr/bin/python
linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000)
libpython2.5.so.1.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
Boom! As I wrote, your local lib install overrides the system lib,
which breaks badly if they are incompatible. If you want to avoid
that, you need to fix your ld.so* configuration.
So how do I "fix" it?
I'm guessing something in the process of compilation of /usr/local
version...
In addition to not setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH is harmful ways, verify
/etc/ld.so* and kill your stuff in /usr/local until you know what
you're doing.
Hmm, sure enough - /etc/ld.so.conf contains "/usr/local/lib" (and the
64bit system doesn't)
Is it supposed to be there? If not, what could've added it? Is it safe
to remove?
Judging from contents of files in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ it looks like every
[package/program/?] can define its own set of library paths. What's the
proper procedure for adding those?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
