Re: Serial Port Bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tod Merley wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 1:02 PM, Karl Larsen <k5di@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Karl Larsen wrote:

Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled

Nothing about being set up in dmesg. It appears the kernel correctly
sees the driver. But for some reason it is not turned on.

If the kernel's serial driver sees a serial port enabled it will print three
lines (not just one) like this:
Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
00:07: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A

On my F8 laptop, which has no serial ports, I still get:
Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled

but no actual ports are found.  Just because the kernel loads the serial
driver doesn't mean it saw a serial port.

So I ask again: is your serial port enabled or disabled in the BIOS?  All
modern BIOS's have the capability to disable the serial ports in hardware to
where the kernel will not see the ports.

Checking voltages won't help you if the chip interface has been disabled from
the BIOS setup program.

    What is the serial port called in the BIOS? I have looked and never
found anything looking like serial port. I will be sure able to do that
IF I know what it is called.



--

        Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
        Linux User
        #450462   http://counter.li.org.

--

fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Hi again Karl Larsen!

It could be called COM1 (or COM2).

With a CMOS set up program you relax, poke a button and check all the
options.  I do not mean select and try I mean simply see what they
are.

Even though your MB is new you could have a bad battery.  Try
selecting the setup defaults while in the CMOS set up program and then
"save and exit".

Good Hunting!

Tod

Hi Tod it was called serial port #1. Could not have been more clear. But it was hidden under other stuff :-)


--

	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
	Linux User
	#450462   http://counter.li.org.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux