Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Karl Larsen wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
Is the serial port enabled in the BIOS?
I have looked and found nothing in the many pages of BIOS things but
I could of missed it.
What model Biostar MB is this? All their manuals are online; older ones
especially included screenshots of the setup screens. Look for, in
the 'integrated peripherals' setup section the 'COM1' and 'COM2' settings
(the names might be different; I don't have a Biostar board in front of me
(got one at home, though, that I might put on the breadboard and check out)).
This is from #setserial -a /dev/ttyS0:
[root@k5di ~]# setserial /dev/ttyS0 -a
/dev/ttyS0, Line 0, UART: unknown, Port: 0x03f8, IRQ: 4
Baud_base: 115200, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
closing_wait: 3000
Flags: spd_normal skip_test auto_irq
This I think is good.
UART is unknown; no, this is bad. If the kernel can't detect the type of UART
(it will likely be 16550A or similar for virtually all modern MB's) then it
can't use the port.
On my own laptop, which does not have ANY serial ports:
[root@localhost ~]# setserial /dev/ttyS0 -a
/dev/ttyS0, Line 0, UART: unknown, Port: 0x03f8, IRQ: 4
Baud_base: 115200, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
closing_wait: 3000
Flags: spd_normal skip_test auto_irq
[root@localhost ~]#
So setserial doesn't help troubleshoot this.
On the box with one serial port:
[root@itadmin ~]# setserial /dev/ttyS0 -a
/dev/ttyS0, Line 0, UART: 16550A, Port: 0x03f8, IRQ: 4
Baud_base: 115200, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
closing_wait: 3000
Flags: spd_normal skip_test
[root@itadmin ~]#
UART is a 16550A, and works.
OK I do not have a manual about BIOS. If they have one I will get it!
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
