Craig White wrote: > box 2 and 3 should be on same subnet as box 1 ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) because > wireless access point is not the same thing as a router. > > Craig > It looks to me like he is trying to use the Linux box as a wireless bridge, but is trying to do it without bridging. It can be done, but only if you give every box on the 192.168.1.0/24 network a path to the 192.168.2.0/24 that uses the Linux box as a gateway, or if you can configure the D-link router to add a static route to the 192.168.2.0/24 network using 192.168.1.5 as the gateway. (I have not read the manual on this router, so I do not know if that is possible.) Even though it is a little harder to set up, in the long run bridging eth0 and ath0 on the Linux box, and having everything on the 192.168.1.0/24 network would be my choice. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
