On Nov 26, 2007 12:29 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That's impressive, but there is a lack of 'yum update' activity noted in > https://wikitech.leuksman.com/view/Server_admin_log > > Are they horribly out of date or just not mentioning the normal churn of > fedora? Isnt that a question for the admins of those servers? The log mentions specific upgrades to specific versions of packages such as lighttpd. Local admins are not required to run a blanket yum update to deal with updates. In fact no one is required to run yum at all. If the admins of those systems have a more structured or conservative protocol for dealing with updates on these systems, then feel free to take it up with them. How they choose to maintain their systems and log such action is completely and utterly inappropriate to discuss in a forum where they are not present.... such as this. -jef -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
