Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Fedora's stated lifetime policy and rate of technical advancement
has to be weighted against other distribution choices in the Fedora
derived ecosystem which move more slowly. The release cycle and
updating policy of the Fedora distribution are not necessarily the
most attractive elements for use in production systems.
Or anything but disposable test boxes?
Like various parts of the build infrastructure that builds the various
Fedora and EPEL packages? I don't consider those to be disposable
test boxes, but I really don't know what your criteria are.
Does more than 80% of wikipedia servers count?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_servers
That's impressive, but there is a lack of 'yum update' activity noted in
https://wikitech.leuksman.com/view/Server_admin_log
Are they horribly out of date or just not mentioning the normal churn of
fedora?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
