Chris Jones wrote:
That sounds like a writer with Debian experience and a feeling Apt
is easier than RPM. There are some things in RPM that are quite odd.
I think Apt is a simpler method. I have ubuntu-7.10 loaded and it
uses Apt and it seems to update as well as RPM.
It is not really correct to compare apt to rpm, a better comparison
would be to compare apt to yum (or at a lower level rpm to dpkg).
Chris
Yes your right. I am going to reload my ubuntu and see if the first
cut is a flook. I loaded it and it gave me the crooked image on my
screen. Then the screen went blank for about 30 minutes it seemed like
but really about 4 minutes. Then up came a real looking almost perfect
image just like it looked after installing. I seems to know about Nvidia
and does the right thing.
If the thing is real then the ubuntu loader is smarter than
anaconda. And it is still just one CD-rom :-)
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
