That sounds like a writer with Debian experience and a feeling Apt is easier than RPM. There are some things in RPM that are quite odd. I think Apt is a simpler method. I have ubuntu-7.10 loaded and it uses Apt and it seems to update as well as RPM.
It is not really correct to compare apt to rpm, a better comparison would be to compare apt to yum (or at a lower level rpm to dpkg).
Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
