Hi, On Nov 14, 2007 10:17 AM, André Costa <blueser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi David, > > On Nov 14, 2007 10:02 AM, David Boles <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Antonio wrote: > > > 2007/11/14, André Costa <blueser@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > I think that as soon as anaconda problem is solved, DVD should be > > > re-issued. I am waiting that before wiping out one of my server, for a > > > clean install > > > Luckily I had other computer upgraded by switching from F7 to > > > development repos and finally to F8. I am following same procedure for > > > F9, development repos is already enabled on one of my computer > > > > > > If what you are calling "my server" is really a server you should be > > running something stable and long lived like CentOS on it anyway and not > > a fast-track distribution such as Fedora. > > > > If you are waiting for Fedora to 'fix' anaconda and release another > > Fedora 8 DVD I think that you will have a long wait. Fedora has never > > released a second DVD that I know of anyway. > > > > Various people have had problems with this update path for various > > reasons. And some here have offered help and advice. But I do not recall > > anyone mentioning writing a bugzilla ticket. That would be the way to > > get better results. Better than posting about it on a general user help > > list. One that most developers don't follow. > > Hey, I said I would file a bug report! =) As a matter of fact, I was > on the way to do it when I found someone already did it: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372011 > > And apparently there's even a workaround that solved the problem for > some people (but, unfortunately, not all): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372011#c28 > > I am at work now, will try this ASAP and post back here (and at bug > 372011) my results. > > > I really have no idea just how many have had problems such as this. Nor > > do I have any idea how many did not have problems such as this. Those > > without problems seldom post success stories. But I would be willing to > > bet that there have been many more successes than failures. ;-) > > Judging from the bug report posted above, and to the bugs marked as > duplicates, quite some people got bitten by this. Still, I agree that > success count should be higher -- but it doesn't "ease the pain" of > being one of the unfortunate ones =( > > Regards, > > Andre Well, just to post back here my progress: the fix described on RH Bugzilla indeed worked for me: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372011#c28 What I did was: - press ESC on the boot screen of the install DVD - type "linux updates=http://katzj.fedoraproject.org/updates-f8-yumloop.img ip=dhcp" At some point during the first text screens (even before the GUI starts up) anaconda says it's obtaining IP address and then proceeds to download the .img file. This is the indication that things are looking good. With the tweaked .img, anaconda barely stood at the "depsolve stage", and proceeded to the next phase. A couple of minutes later it was installing the packages, to my surprise =) Last warning: it stood a long time on the last step before the reboot, but eventually it ended (at least the HD led showed it was working, so I did not panic -- at least not much ;-)) So, this is being written from a fresh new F8 upgrade =) All is good so far, and my faith on Fedora has been restored =) Regards, Andre -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
