On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 12:03 -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > I guess I was looking for some input on the bigger question: Is this a > packaging error that needs to be fixed, or is it expected from normal > use of the TeX packages? > > I don't have the slightest idea of how TeX's font system works, but it > seems to me that warnings and installation of .rpmnew files should not > be part of the installation of these packages when I haven't modified > anything. > > If it's merely a matter that both packages include the same .map files, > that's a plain error, no? > > <Joe > A component of tetex regenerates the .map files when it is installed. Because of this, the .map files are marked as configuration files, even though most people will never touch them. The output you see is normal. So the warnings and .rpmnew files are normal and not bugs. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
