Re: scripts for portable, incremental backups to external disk (or DVD)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 2:30 PM +0200 8/9/07, M. Fioretti wrote:
 ...
>create something that is completely readable with any operating system
>(including hidden files, links, long file names...): what if I need to
>recover files from there from a friend's Mac or Windows laptop? This is
>a filesystem question, so how would I format/ (re) create it?

I like to do uncompressed tar direct to DVD.  The machine reading the DVD
needs tar, but it doesn't need any compatible filesystem, and all the file
attributes are in the archive.  Tar will be available into the future.  Of
course, extracted files might lose some of their meta-data if the
destination filesystem won't handle it.

I recommend against compression only because a single-bit error will ruin
the rest of the data.  For large amounts of data, use tar's multi-volume
feature (which, AIUI, requires using a temp file and writing the DVD from
that -- I don't know a way to get growisofs to "change disks"), and also
possibly tar's incremental feature.

Personally, in addtion to occasional backups of my local machine, I'm
backing up a server every few hours to another "warm backup" server, and
monthly to a local disk volume, and from that making a DVD monthly.  The
server's data fits easily on a DVD, so I haven't used tar's multi-volume
feature for the server, and I haven't use tar's incremental feature at all.


>check periodically, as quickly as possible, that everything is still
>intact, that is that no single files or links etc... have been damaged.
>Ideally, I'd make this last thing an option of the script itself, that is
>"check the drive first, and if everything is fine proceed with the
>new backup operation"

How do you define "damaged?  I would think that files and links are allowed
to change between backups.  If you just do the backup, it won't hurt any
existing backups.

 ...
>Now a couple of OT question, answers to these are much better sent off list.
>
>1) What about reliability of hard disk versus DVD based backups?
>   Links to relevant reading are welcome.
 ...

Hard disks and optical media are different, and so is the data format, so
having both kinds of backup will be more robust than either alone.  Do an
rsync to the other hard disk, and back that up to DVD.  As has been
mentioned, the hard disk could be made bootable, but I prefer the reinstall
and restore approach.
-- 
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux