Re: Fedora - DELL ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Les Mikesell wrote:
Andy Green wrote:
That's a valid point, but in the US anyone can sue anyone else over
just about anything and it's not over till the appeals are used up.
How can you be sure that someone won't claim ownership of some
obscure parts of Linux and sue over that - again?
What is your point here? Because on any given car journey you might
get rear-ended you should just revv it up and drive it into a wall?
My point is that the mp3 patent suit against Microsoft is an oddball
case, not really settled yet, and not relevant to the real issue which
is how to legally obtain the components you need to use together.
Yeah 'oddball' like Eolas. 'Oddball' like blackberry. That is what
patent attacks look like. Your point was ''How can you be sure that
someone won't claim ownership of some obscure parts of Linux and sue
over that - again?'' which is no point at all but some kind of FUD.
If MSFT have a secret stock of attack patents that can't be helped. A
Meteorite could land on our heads any time. But for sure MP3 will get
someone like Redhat attacked at the moment seeing as Microsoft are
attacked successfully.
Exactly, so the question for any potential user is, how do they get a
complete, legal system that does everything they need and are willing to
meet the licensing requirement for. In the mp3 case I'm perfectly
willing to spend some small amount towards licensing and in fact have
(probably like most of us) done so as a part of the cost of several
devices and OS's. I'm not particularly interested in arranging my own
licensing with some vast number of individual copyright/patent holders
though, so what is the appropriate way to do this and deliver it
together with GPL'd content?
The straight answer to that depends on what patents your "GPL'd content"
crosses. Because it is GPL'd, there should be no copyright law exposure.
One of the attractive features of working with a RHAT-based distro is
that they were on the ball about this a long time ago and already did
considerable work to filter what they issue. "No MP3" is in that sense
a huge feature for Fedora, not a problem. Since RHAT are cash-rich last
time I looked, they are in far more danger of a patent attack than you
or I. If they have had their lawyers look at what they are distributing
and rated the danger acceptable, this is a good sign that smaller
companies shipping the same should be OK.
Like Rahul pointed out you can go to Fluendo and then you have somebody
to pay, but there is no guarantee you paid everybody with an interest in
what you're shipping, as Microsoft found out. So there is no certainty
in the world. (Tuna and pasta was for tea).
-Andy
[Index of Archives]
[Older Fedora Users]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Package Announce]
[EPEL Announce]
[Fedora Magazine]
[Fedora News]
[Fedora Summer Coding]
[Fedora Laptop]
[Fedora Cloud]
[Fedora Advisory Board]
[Fedora Education]
[Fedora Security]
[Fedora Scitech]
[Fedora Robotics]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Infrastructure]
[Fedora Websites]
[Anaconda Devel]
[Fedora Devel Java]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora Fonts]
[ATA RAID]
[Fedora Marketing]
[Fedora Management Tools]
[Fedora Mentors]
[SSH]
[Fedora Package Review]
[Fedora R Devel]
[Fedora PHP Devel]
[Kickstart]
[Fedora Music]
[Fedora Packaging]
[Centos]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Fedora Legal]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Fedora OCaml]
[Coolkey]
[Virtualization Tools]
[ET Management Tools]
[Yum Users]
[Tux]
[Yosemite News]
[Gnome Users]
[KDE Users]
[Fedora Art]
[Fedora Docs]
[Asterisk PBX]
[Fedora Sparc]
[Fedora Universal Network Connector]
[Libvirt Users]
[Fedora ARM]