Re: Fedora - DELL ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jim Cornette wrote:

Except that it doesn't work with a lot of hardware. And the engineers designing the hardware and writing the drivers for other OS versions are probably the best qualified to write and maintain the Linux drivers too. They probably would also be the most motivated if the driver interface was stable so they didn't have to re-do it all the time.

I agree that the provider would be the best source for providing the best driver for their product. I do think that input from actual users and coders outside the provider could improve performance of drivers to a greater degree than closing up the source since Linux changes so frequently.

There's this great programming concept called an 'interface' that popular operating systems have used successfully to allow different sets of people to write components separately that continue to interoperate across different revisions of each. Typically, projects don't get these exactly right the first time but after a few revisions they understand all the requirements and can stop making frequent changes. How long has Linux been around now?

 > DRM is key for Microsoft in my opinion.

Microsoft thinks there is a demand for DRM so they provide it - it isn't something useful on its own. Personally I think that demand will go away by itself except for rental-type distribution models when customers realize how limiting it is and the content suppliers that thought it would sell find out otherwise - and customers should ultimately decide these things.


I hope your ideal that the consumer will prevail and Windows will back off from such practices. A user should not be so limited in using their own computers.

What users accept as limitations should be based on having choices and full disclosure of the implications. Operating systems and technology providers should not be taking away any of these choices from you. A very low cost rental model based on content that expires might be perfectly acceptable to a lot of people and if so, we'd all be better off if the ability to handle such content worked across many platforms instead of forcing users to buy and run only the platform that handles their desired content. If consumers find the price/value acceptable for content with long-term DRM, that's OK too, but I think it will be too cumbersome and fail on its own - especially given any competition. But the thing that should make it fail is a better alternative, not someone ranting against the concept or adding restrictions to other licensing terms.

The practical issue is not the omission of the functional parts with legal restrictions, it is the fact that the GPL prohibits others from obtaining the legal rights to distribute these missing parts, combining them and offering a fully functional product.

This probably needs addressed so the items would be more distributable and less in need of legal council after some arbitrary solution is reached. I see this battle going on for a long time and without resolution though.

This is inherent in the GPL without clear interface boundaries. If we had a clean definition of what can add value and capabilities to the kernel without the possibility of being considered a derived work under copyright law everyone would be able to cooperate to the extent needed to compete with operating systems that don't have this problem. There is a similar situation for every work that contains GPL'd components but needs additional plugins to handle different content or situations. As things stand there is no clearly legal way to provide all the necessary pieces together.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux