Re: Fedora 6 is not able to install in PIII, 256MB SD RAM, 1.3GHz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 18:45 +0000, James Wilkinson wrote:
> Ric Moore wrote:
> > Do you have an Intel PIII or an AMD PIII clone? Could make a LOT of
> > difference. Installs to my old clunker have been problematic due to some
> > design flaws in the older AMD P5 CPU's. I had to roll my own kernels to
> > get some speed out of it, but it was worth it, with a 200% increase in
> > performance, at least. Slow as molasses to start with. 
> 
> Hey, a K5, K6, and K7 ("Athlon") were all very different chips -- each
> was a totally different design. So generalisations about one chip
> normally don't apply to the others (unless they apply to x86 processors
> in general). And if it's a 1.3 GHz processor, it's an Athlon. Which
> means it's pretty similar to a PIII in performance characteristics, but
> probably a bit faster (and it wouldn't have SSE).
> 
> I'm also intrigued as to how you managed to get a 200% increase in
> performance from a K5 (I presume you meant a K5)? Were you enabling
> specific processor work-arounds? Was that on a particular benchmark, or
> did you get it in general? It seems -- implausible.
> 
> (And recommendations for a 1.2, 2.0 or 2.2-era kernel don't necessarily
> apply for a 2.6 kernel -- most processor work-arounds have been built-in
> to generic kernels, like the ones Fedora supplies, and are applied or
> not as necessary at run-time.)
> 
> James (who started using Linux on a K5).

Thanks for the history lesson. 

Ric (who started out using linux on a brand spanking new 486 DX2/66 with
a whooping 16 megs of memory and a 15" multisync display, all for the
low low price of $5000.) 

Check out the linux counter number below and then consider I was around
way before the counter came out. What I said stands, nor does anything
you wrote have anything to do with what I was asking him. We need to
know what exactly he's working with and if he has onboard video that
shares memory with the mainboard. That has been a problem at install
time since I worked at RedHat in 2000. But, thanks for all of the above,
I'm sure you got some sort of gratification from it. Ric

-- 
================================================
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/
http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar
http://www.wayward4now.net
================================================


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux