Re: Fedora on an AMD Athlon 64 (3200+) machine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've been using AMD Athlon 64 CPUs for a couple years now. I'm very pleased with the results -- my current machine features a dual core CPU, the 4800+, and I'm using an Asrock motherboard and OCZ "value select" memory with it. I'm having very good results with FC5 x86_64 and expect that to be true with any Red Hat-based OS. 

Incorrect installation of the processor and memory can (and does) result in poor performance or no performance at all. That has happened to me. I learned the hard way a few years ago after frying a few hundred dollars worth of motherboard and memory one day. Building a new computer is no different from building a birdhouse with one exception: you have to have complete and utter respect for delicate parts and static electricity. Check for installation hints that include how-to photographs -- that is what I did. Maximum PC magazine used to keep a section of their website devoted to step-by-step photos for how to build a system. Use those silly looking wrist straps that discharge static -- they save a lot of tears.

As long as you are using a relatively new motherboard updated with the latest BIOS, memory meeting the requirements of the motherboard which has been tested with memtest86 to confirm it is okay, and a good hard drive, you should be fine with any OS designed to run on the processor.

Bob Cochran



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Prindeville [mailto:philipp_subx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 07:16 PM
> To: 'For users of Fedora'
> Subject: Re: Fedora on an AMD Athlon 64 (3200+) machine
> 
> James Wilkinson wrote:
> 
> >Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>So I'll ask again if anyone is happily running the x86_64 version of FC-6
> >>on an Athlon 64 machine?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I suppose my previous answer wasn't *that* clear -- yes, my setup
> >mirrored yours down to the 64 bit install, with a 3200 processor. I don't
> >know if yours is one of the Socket 939 or Socket 754 variants, but that
> >*really* shouldn't matter (mine's a Socket 939). I *do* know that I'm
> >running on an NForce 4-based ASUS motherboard, whereas I think yours is
> >Via-based.
> >  
> >
> 
> Die-size and internal voltage level are different for 939 and 754
> chips, aren't they? Bigger die size (which the 939 has, since the
> pin-spacing is the same) means better heat transfer.
> 
> -Philip
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux