Re: Fedora on an AMD Athlon 64 (3200+) machine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2006-11-18 20:09:43, Joel Gomberg <obligor11-fedora@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Timothy Murphy wrote:

I have a Targa desktop with this processor,
and I have always had problems installing Fedora x86_64 on it.
...
(SNIP)
Yesterday I installed the i386 version on my Athlon 64 machine,
and it seems to run without any problems at all -
I compiled kernel-2.6.18.2 in a few seconds,
whereas trying to compile the same kernel under x86_64 caused
several
crashes during the compilation, and when it was complete
the kernel only ran for a few minutes before crashing.
(I had the experience trying to re-compile the latest Fedora
kernel.)

I suppose it is possible that these problems arise from some fault
in my computer, but it seems much more likely to be a software
problem.

So I'll ask again if anyone is happily running the x86_64 version of
FC-6
on an Athlon 64 machine?
Yes.  I have an Athlon 64 (3200+), a Gigabyte motherboard, and an
Nvidia nforce3 chipset.  I have run FC5 and upgraded to FC6 with
excellent performance and absolutely no problems with the x86_64
architecture.

Like the author, I have a Gigabyte MB (but with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 dual-core 4200+ processor). I previously ran the x86_64 version under both fc5 and now run it under fc6. I can compile (and have compiled) x86_64 kernels and run with them with no problems. (although I do not use the xen kernel).

In fact, the ONLY real problems I have encountered relate to the lack of 64-bit drivers to play wmv and asx files (needed for work where some dope decided to send out presentations in .wmv format sometimes). (And yes, I have also installed the 32-bit libraries to play some of them so it's not a show-stopper by any means).

The speed advantages are great (compared to my previous Athlon xp2500+ box), and the dual-core is a big help for some multi-threaded things.

Overall, like Joel Gomberg, I have had absolutely NO (detectable) problems with the x86_64 architecture.

Have you checked both the memory and drives on your machine - what you describe could be a problem with either.


--
william w. austin                               waustin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
"life is just another phase i'm going through. this time, anyway ..."

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux