Les Mikesell wrote:
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 11:34, Craig White wrote:
----
and likewise, samba developers took a position today
http://news.samba.org/announcements/team_to_novell/
Craig
Knee-jerk reaction by me would have been to demand that samba and cifs be
removed from their distribution, but I see it didn't quite come to that,
so its just so much hot air. Unfortunately...
----
they really can't do that. If it is demonstrated that this deal does
indeed violate GPL license and thus disqualifies Novell from legally
distributing GPL licensed software, it won't go unnoticed.
Interestingly enough, this event probably gives rise to the best
argument in favor of GPL v3 than all other events.
This isn't going to play out well. There's almost certainly
something in Microsoft's huge patent portfolio that is
included in samba/cifs and required to make it work. I
don't see how samba developers could win a battle like
that. In fact I've expected exactly that scenario for
years and don't see any possible mesh with the GPL unless
an agreement like Novell's also permits free redistribution
with the patent protection included for any subsequent
recipients.
Which, according to the FSLC, it does not.
This is classic bait-and-switch.
Temlakos
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
