On Sunday 12 November 2006 11:43, Craig White wrote: >On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 12:13 -0700, Phil Meyer wrote: >> taharka wrote: >> > On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 09:10 -0700, Craig White wrote: >> >> for a completely different perspective... >> > >> > Yes, I've read that one. Also, plenty of different perspectives in >> > the comments section at that link. Not much activity though since >> > Nov 5th. >> > >> >> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061102175508403 >> >> >> >> Craig >> > >> > taharka >> > >> > Lexington, Kentucky U.S.A. >> >> Still fairly polarized, but still worth the read: >> >> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/20061109a.html >> >> And PJ (groklaw) has a story about it today. > >---- >and likewise, samba developers took a position today > >http://news.samba.org/announcements/team_to_novell/ > >Craig Knee-jerk reaction by me would have been to demand that samba and cifs be removed from their distribution, but I see it didn't quite come to that, so its just so much hot air. Unfortunately... -- Cheers, Gene -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
