On Wednesday 08 November 2006 18:02, Kevin Kofler wrote: > James Wilkinson <fedora <at> aprilcottage.co.uk> writes: > > The one listed in that LWN message. The one cached in Google at > > http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:f8A9cnTSmhIJ:rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fre >shrpms/fedora/6/dkms-pwc/dkms-pwc-10.0.11-1.20061018.noarch.html+dkms-pwc+fe >dora&hl=en&gl=uk&ct=clnk&cd=1&client=firefox-a > > > which seems to have no current page, and points to a now-nonexistent > > directory on freshrpms.net... > > > > I think it must have been pulled. Sorry. > > That was just a DKMS package anyway, i.e. a package which automates > building the module from source, not a real binary package. It's probably > not much harder to just go directly to the source: > http://saillard.org/linux/pwc/ > Kevin, if pwc is in the kernel these days, what happens if you compile the same module from source? Do they conflict? If not, what determines which one gets loaded? > Make sure you have kernel-devel installed (the version corresponding to > your kernel, including architecture, see also bug #211941), then follow the > instructions in the source code to build the module. If there are any > errors when building the module for the current kernel, we can probably > tell you how to fix them. (I know a few of the common ones, at least.) That one's already sorted. I had a .586 kernel and a .686 kernel-devel. Anne
Attachment:
pgp35cIW5mGoo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
