Re: mail server send mail to yahoo bulk folder

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim:
>> Blocking an entire country's TLD *is* a racist act.

Res:
> and now from your previous childish rant,

Trying to win an argument by claiming your opponent is being childish
because they won't cave into your view, is a rather poor way at trying
to win it.  What I see as childish, here, is you trying to justify
racist-like behaviour and claiming that it isn't.

> i am also now a racist because I block entire ISP domains

Yes, that's the very definition of being prejudicial, since you want to
be pedantic about what YOU think the term racist means.  Whether you
want to be pedantic about "racist" being only a specific race is being
wet.  There isn't a "countryist" similar term.  If you're prejudiced
against an entire country, that's seen as a racist act by those in that
country.  Likewise, is advocating that response.  Whether that be Korea,
Russia, or any other commonly believed by be spam source.  If you
blocked the whole of my country, I'd regard it the same way, whether I
was Black, Caucasian, Yellow, or whatever.  And you'll find that most
citizens of any country will feel similarly.

> Tim, are you a spammer? maybe you are (since having such a hissy fit) 
> one of the ones i justifiably block access to, who knows because im
> not about to tell you what network I manage, but those who furiously
> argue the point of black lists, tend to be.

No, I'm not.  And I'd be first in line buying $5 a punch tickets to beat
up a spammer.  Quite frankly, if I were, this would be the least of my
worries, there's a plethora of ways to circumvent that lame attempt at
dealing with spam.  But it's next to impossible to do legit internet
activity when some idiot sabotages the internet by making certain top
level domains unworkable.

Incompetent admins, who cannot manage spam properly, and resort to carte
blanche blocking, ARE another problem in themselves.  Likewise for any
other seriously stupid ideas they implement about how to tell apart spam
from non-spam.  It takes a hell of a good two-by-four whacking over
their head to make them realise that what they do is NOT a good
solution, it's clear that you need quite a lot more.  Yes, the very
notion of black lists is flawed, the implementation of them even more
so.

-- 
(Currently testing FC5, but still running FC4, if that's important.)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux