On 18/10/06, Michael Wiktowy <michael.wiktowy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/18/06, Thufir <hawat.thufir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:24:58 -0800, Kam Leo wrote: > [...] > > If Bittorrent can get through the router then Azureus can. Just > > configure Azureus to use the same port, e.g. 6881. > > The above reasoning holds for me, that if bittorrent gets throught the > router then azureus should also get through the router...? > > Azureus reports: > > Testing port 6881 ... NAT Error I am not entirely sure if the standard bittorrent application even does the NAT tests that Azureus does so it may be a case of Azureus giving you more info. In the end, both will run behind a NAT router and they will download but your download rate will suffer in most cases since a lot of bittorrent clients that cannot connect to your client directly will decrease their upload rate to you. That is a consequence of not being able to do port forwarding on a router that you don't control.
I have seen Azureus's port test fail, even when port forwarding is set up and remote connections can be established. The thing to do is look at torrent health; if they are always yellow, never green, then forwarding isn't working. If the ports are set up the same way for bittorrent and Azureus they will both have the same problem as Michael says. In general I found Azureus worked better (mainly that connections were faster) when running on Sun Java. <http://www.city-fan.org/tips/JpackageJava> is probably the best guide to getting that working on FC4/5. -- imalone -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
