Re: 10TB RAID issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "m" == maccy  <maccy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

m> Just got a new 10TB file server with 2 3ware controllers giving me
m> 2 x 5TB arrays.

I've done many large arrays and have just recently been wrestling with
a 12TB single-controller array.

The bottom line is that unless you employ gross hacks, you will not be
able to both partition and boot from an array larger than 2TB.  The
standard MS-DOS partition table maxes out at 2TB, so for larger
devices you need to use the new style GPT (GUID Partition Table), but
then you cannot boot from that device.  (HP says they have a way to do
so, and have conveniently patented it.)

One option is to stick another drive in the machine and boot from
that.  Or put in two drives on the motherboard controller and set up a
simple mirrored RAID so that you don't lose redundancy.  You probably
lose hot-swap, though, unless your machine has additional hot-swap
bays you can use.

Another option is to enable 2TB auto-carving in the 3ware BIOS and
recreate your arrays.  This will present the arrays as a number of 2TB
drives to the OS; you can join them all via LVM and then create
volumes out of that.

The latter option is probably the simplest, but I haven't evaluated
the performance aspect yet.

There are some gross hacks which work to get grub installed on a >2TB
volume as long as /boot is at the beginning of the drive (by supplying
a fake geometry to GRUB) and a way to create an LVM partition that
actually extends beyond the partitionable region of the disk, but it's
not really something I'd recommend as you never know when something
might decide to cut off the end of that volume and hose your data.

I'm still experimenting with trying to get grub installed on the
protective MBR of a GPT-partitioned disk, but this technically results
in something that isn't GPT and will probably cause the partitioning
tool to become rather upset.  It probably also breaks recovery disks.
Neither of those things are good for a machine with critical data.

m> Have installed FC4

With just a few weeks until FC4 goes to Legacy, are you really sure
you don't want to install FC5 or something like Centos?

 - J<

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux