Re: Checking internet connection without a winbox

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim:
>> When that happens, does it keep on trying the first one first, or carry
>> on using the one that responded quickest?  I seemed to notice the latter
>> behaviour.
>> 
>> For instance, I have my own caching name server, with local machine
>> addresses in it as well.  I also have a router with its own, non
>> configurable, DNS server.  I had my computers set to use my name server
>> first, and the router second.  But found that local machines weren't
>> being resolved, the computers were using the router's name server (which
>> happens to respond quicker).

Les Mikesell:
> I think when you run your own caching nameserver with forwarders
> set, named will use the fastest forwarder as well as cache
> the answers.

In my case, I don't have any forwarders set.  I see little point in
running my own name server (which I began doing because of my ISP's
crappy ones), if I simply get it to forward request to the ISP's crappy
servers, instead of acting *as* a DNS server.  :-\

> When you use the resolver library against remote nameservers it
> doesn't remember much of anything although individual applications
> might.

Though individual applications get the system to resolve addresses for
them, they don't read the /etc/resolv.conf file and then run their own
DNS resolving routines on the DNS server addresses that they find listed
in there.  With an exception or two (e.g. Squid generally resolves
addresses on its lonesome).

I'd noticed that Windows does seem to carry on using whichever
nameserver last answered, before switching over to the other if there
was a problem.  Then, if that happens, it keeps on using the last one
that responded.  I wondered if Linux played the same trick.

Neither OS appears to use both of them all the time (spreading the
load), which I can think of as another way to make good use of having
several name servers at your disposal.

-- 
(Currently running FC4, in case that's important to the thread)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux