Claude Jones wrote: > On Sunday June 11 2006 22:24, Claude Jones wrote: >> Yum is still not working quite right. It just supposedly updated >> bind and the kernel and about four other packages, and when it was >> finished, I came up with the same exact packages needing to be >> updated on the next try... > I seem to have prevailed. Actually, I must give credit where it's > due - the final clean-up was carried out by PUP. I'd been using > Yumex Ahaaa!!! Funny (not really) that you should say that, because I've had two machines b0rked after a mass update using Yumex this week, on a network of seven machines all config'd to update from the same in-house "yam" server (yes yam with an "a"). The other 5 were fine, including the server itself, *because I updated them using just yum and not yumex*. The type of errors I was getting with yumex were: "scriptlet failed: error 250" or similar (sorry I don't remember the error number) over and over on every single updated package. The result was the RPM database became out of sync with the installed packages. This *only* happened using Yumex, never when just using yum. I had to mass-uninstall then reinstall huge portions of the distro to get it back in sync. Eventually I decided the installations were so b0rked, that the safest thing to do was wipe and start again. Yumex failing to find package dependencies that were *clearly* available, and yum from the bash prompt found them immediately afterwards. Strange "stuck in a loop" problem reading repo data, where the yumex progress bar would flip up to 100% then start again, over and over, maybe a hundred times, until I had to kill it. #] yum clean all ... didn't help. Rebuilding the RPM database didn't help. Conclusion - Yumex is b0rked. Next time it happens (if I'm brave enough to ever use Yumex again) I'll take details and file a Bugzilla. - K. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
