nigel henry wrote: > Bringing other repo's into the arena can cause problems. > Particularly I'm thinking of livna, and atrpms. I'm not too sure > sure how you can resolve this. I'm not knocking livna or atrpms, but > I think for doing system upgrades with more than one repo open is > asking for trouble. you have to be carefull. I'd agree that using ATrpm's could be problematic, purely based on the fact that Axel seems to duplicate packages already available in core/extras/updates. Why he does this, I'm not sure, but it does make me very nervous about permanently enabling his repo. Like you, I am not knocking ATrpms; just being cautious. Similarly I would imagine that kde-redhat obsoletes/replaces Core packages, which is fine, if changes are properly synchronised with package changes in Core Updates (and assuming that all else being equal, any given kde-redhat package is not buggy). Livna OTOH is a different kettle of fish. AFAICT Dams does not duplicate anything in Core, etc., and I've had nothing but success with his packages. I'm not saying he's perfect, but then even Core Updates are subject to errors - look at the recent evolution-data-server farce, for evidence of that - nobody's perfect. - K. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
