Our university exchange server is incompatible with
evolution-connector, so it is useless for me. SO, in return for you
having access to your Exchange server, everybody else who wants a
clock is required to install evolution-data-server, libbeagle, and who
knows what else.
I think it is great that you like evolution, but everybody who does
not want it should not be required to install all that stuff and put
up with all that misery.
there should be a clock that is just a clock, and there should be a
separate "evolution clock" for people who want evolution.
Another packaging example. I like Nautilus, but do not want the addon
nautilus-cd-burner. Nevertheless, if you install nautilus, n-c-b is
required.
On 6/8/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 18:12 +0100, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote:
> > Now the gnome clock is back, and just for fun I compared the cost of
> > the clocks. If I'm reading this ps output correctly, the gnome
> > clock-applet uses almost 1% of 1gig system memory and it uses 9x as
> > much as the wmCalClock or wmclock. Am I reading this right?
>
> Well you've answered your own query.
>
> The reason the gnome-clock-applet is so bloated, is because it hooks
> into evolution-data-server libecal.
>
> Frankly, if it wasn't for Beagle and the clock, I wouldn't have anything
> to do with Evolution on this system - I'd much prefer it that way.
And I thought that was the best thing about FC5... My company has
conference calls all the time to coordinate work across several
offices and the scheduling changes all the time with meeting requests
managed on an exchange server. I'd never remember them without a
popup at the right time and before this update (which I haven't done
yet...) Evolution was doing those popups at least as well as Outlook.
> I don't use Evolution - I don't want Evolution - but I have to install
> it for it's dependants.
Do you have any scheduled events/reminders?
> Both Evolution and Beagle come from Novell, so I can understand why the
> two are linked, but it's about time that we found some way of replacing
> some of the bloated dependencies for a lot of Fedora components (extras
> or otherwise), either by isolating and modularising those components
> (i.e. libecal) or replacing them with alternatives.
A dummy hook would make sense for people who can keep track of
everything themselves, but I'd like mine to work - and playing a
sound specific to this event would be nice too.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504
University of Kansas
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
