Andy Green wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
See above. I've read to many false promises from Fedora leadership to
give any trust in any such promise before I have it in my hands.
I think I see a trend here... you may be placing too much emphasis on
Fedora
leadership (and "promises"), when in fact, much (most!) of the
work/support
here needs to happen in the *community*.
I generally agree with this, but it is a little bit more complex when
the reins are held by, and the agenda controlled by, a benign
(generous even) but motivated-in-specific ways Redhat. There's no
evil there but it makes for a slightly curious psychological tension
in the project.
-Andy
Personally I prefer Gnome, but then that is my choice. One thing I like
about Linux when compared to that other operating system is one does
have choices.
My feeling is the core of Fedora at 5 cd's is getting a little out of
hand; if I may make a suggestion in this area why not reduce the core to
a true minimum needed to intiate an installation and create bundles of
extras on various particular themes such as the KDE extras bundle.
This way after I have downloaded the mandatory core I could select the
various extra bundles that contain other ares I am interested in. As
things are now I am just installing desktops, I don't need the server
options. If I had the option to not download server applications I
would save on band width when downloading the iso's, if at a later date
I find I need to install servers I could always download the "server
extras" or which ever ones I have chosen to not install at this time.
Norm
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
