On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 08:31:19 -0600 Jake Edge <jake@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > We processed a huge number of KDE security announcements for F18 last > week: https://lwn.net/Articles/553900/ ... but the comments on that > article indicate that almost all of them are not actually security > fixes and are, instead, some kind of koji overreach? seemingly the > same pile of fixes showed up for F17 yesterday ... is it just > kdeplasma-addons that needs to be highlighted (perhaps with a mention > that koji cascaded the bug into a bunch of unaffected packages?) ... > or is there more? or are they truly all affected? This is due to this being 1 single update with all the kde packages. See: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10182/ So, all those packages are all "FEDORA-2013-10182" and since you can only mark the single update security or not, the entire thing (and all packages) are marked security. I don't know if this will be handled any better in bodhi 2.0, but we could surely look and try and handle things better. What would you like to see for an update like this? Different names for each package? Or some what to tag only those package(s) that are security updates? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- security mailing list security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/security
