Re: tangent: PolicyKit and PAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 01:27:40PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Like I said, this is a tangent, and I'm certainly not expecting anyone to
> > work on this. But it'd be cool if they did.
> Just as everybody else is struggling to get away from pam's awful
> apis...I don't think this would be a step forward; but sure, it might be
> doable. 

The awful API is actually an argument _for_ doing such a thing: it gets
encapsulated away in only one place that needs to be maintained, and
everyone can just write to PolicyKit.

Annd speaking of tangents and horrible interfaces, I should add that one
thing I'm very genuinely happy to learn in all of this is that the pkla config
files are key=value rather than the old PolicyKit.conf xml file. So much
nicer for humans to work with!

-- 
Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Systems Architect 
Cyberinfrastructure Labs / Instructional & Research Computing
Computing & Information Technology 
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences

--
Fedora-security-list mailing list
Fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Coolkey]

  Powered by Linux