On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 18:34 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > The problem you run into is then you set yourself up for having to > release all or nothing. If distro A is holding up release of fixed > packages for distro B thats not a good thing. If we want our pushing > tools to close bugs accordingly (like they do with Core) then we're > probably going to have to separate these by distributions. > Don't we usually release updates for all distros at the same time? For Legacy, it was a PITA when we tried to have a bug per distro. > Now to use mozilla again, why couldn't we push all 4 products into one > bug report? 20 bugs down to 5 bugs is a pretty big drop. And there > could be a tracking bug that has all the info, and sub-bugs filed in > each distro to be the place holder for when said package goes out. This > allows a package to go out, allows a pushing system to close a bug > associated w/ a package update, and allows a top level bug to easily > track the progress of each affected distro. > Four products can result in four different update advisories. Wouldn't a pushing system have trouble figuring out if the bug can be closed automatically or not? Marc.
