Re: One Bugzilla report per distro version or one for all?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Thursday 11 May 2006 15:15, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > Best practice question:
> >
> > Assuming a security issue in package foo which is shipped and vulnerable
> > in many distro versions, do people find it better to file one
> > copy-pasted bug report per distro version or a "combined" one for all
> > which lists the affected distro versions?
> >
> > The one-for-all approach would have the benefit of easier copy-pasting
> > between audit/* files and probably more accurate Bugzilla references in
> > maintainer %changelog entries as the same specfile is used for all
> > distro versions in the vast majority of cases.  It could make things
> > slightly harder to track, eg. in Bugzilla queries and such.
> I would think one bugzilla entry for all.  If you did one for each  you could 
> be dealing with 5 bug reports.

I ack this.  Things can quickly get out of hand.  To beat my favorite dead
horse, mozilla, you have 4 products, across 5 distributions = 20 bugs.

-- 
    JB


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Coolkey]

  Powered by Linux