On Thursday 09 March 2006 14:37, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 22:14 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > Why is that? I would MUCH prefer if discussions would be kept on-list. > > Apologies if this was explained earlier, I missed the first few posts > > here. > > I guess it depends on how we use this list. We may want to ping for > somebody to help with a given package, but not want to have a public > record of the discussion of sensitive matter until such time as updates > are prepared. I don't want to see this list become a place for hackers > to listen in on what packages are known to be flawed. We definetly do not want this. a private list is probably needed for such things perhaps becoming public after 30 -60 days > It took me VERY little time to get used to <ctrl>l to reply list. I am > on a LOT of lists and not all are configured the same. Remembering > <ctrl>l for every list will always do the right thing wrt replying to > the list. There are other RFE matters against munging the reply-to > headers, but that's an exercise for the bored. I've voiced my opinion, > others can do the same. kmail you just hit l to reply to list Dennis
