On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 22:14 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Why is that? I would MUCH prefer if discussions would be kept on-list. > Apologies if this was explained earlier, I missed the first few posts > here. I guess it depends on how we use this list. We may want to ping for somebody to help with a given package, but not want to have a public record of the discussion of sensitive matter until such time as updates are prepared. I don't want to see this list become a place for hackers to listen in on what packages are known to be flawed. > > I'd MUCH rather see reply-to > > > NOT get munged and create misfires to the list itself. I'm sorry your > > > client doesn't support list-post, perhaps complain upstream? > > > > Mine isn't and I'm using thunderbird, which is imho a respectable > > client, thus assuming that clients handle reply-list is a wrong assumption. > > The FC4 Evolution I'm using does kind of support it, but the option is > not very prominently available in the UI. And because very few lists > are configured in a way that I need to take special care to get my > replies to go to the list address, the keyboard shortcut doesn't stick > very easily in muscle memory. It took me VERY little time to get used to <ctrl>l to reply list. I am on a LOT of lists and not all are configured the same. Remembering <ctrl>l for every list will always do the right thing wrt replying to the list. There are other RFE matters against munging the reply-to headers, but that's an exercise for the bored. I've voiced my opinion, others can do the same. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
