[Scitech] any objections to BLIS soname bump in el7?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'd like to upgrade the el7 blis package (v0.4) to the latest version
(v0.6), which has a soname bump.  It's not currently required by
anything else in EPEL, and the BLAS compatibility shims won't change.
Any objection?

The current version has a potential security problem from using popen,
and is missing optimizations.  (BLIS is what you want for AVX512 BLAS,
in particular, at least until OpenBLAS sorts that out.)
_______________________________________________
scitech mailing list -- scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to scitech-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux