> > You'll find (e.g. via https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/) > > there's already a stalled review for htslib: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504 > > Sure I will keep in mind to check the current review status and Copr, and etc. > I take a look at the ticket for htslib. For the htslib bugzilla ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504 I updated htslib.spec to the latest version 1.9, and commented on it. Is there any item to fix for the htslib.spec? Could you comment for the ticket ? Thanks. On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:17 AM Jun Aruga <jaruga@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Dominik and Dave, thanks for the help and tips! > > > You'll find (e.g. via https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/) > > there's already a stalled review for htslib: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504 > > Sure I will keep in mind to check the current review status and Copr, and etc. > I take a look at the ticket for htslib. > > > For what it's worth, I'm starting to build some HPC packages for aarch64 > > in copr, including Extrae et al from the Mont Blanc stable. > > Oh thanks. Yes, Mont Blanc arch is aarch64. > > -- > Jun Aruga | He - His - Him -- Jun | He - His - Him jaruga@xxxxxxxxxx / IRC: jaruga _______________________________________________ scitech mailing list -- scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to scitech-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
