Re: Updating from f17 to f18 as well as the f17 sagemath packages in pcpa.fedorapeople.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/1/17 Vedran Miletić <rivanvx@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2013/1/17 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>   I followed the procedures at
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_17_-.3E_Fedora_18
>> and after a reboot, updated my sagemath x86_64 repository.
>>
>>   I had a few f15 plexus&maven packages that appeared to cause
>> upgrade problems as well as ffmpeg-libs, but this was enough
>> for me to convert a f17 computer to f18:
>>
>> $ sudo yum erase sagemath
>> $ sudo yum erase plexus-appserver plexus-runtime-builder
>> plexus-maven-plugin maven-shared plexus-xmlrpc ffmpeg-libs
>> $ sudo yum update yum
>> $ sudo yum clean all
>> $ sudo yum --releasever=18 --disableplugin=presto distro-sync
>> $ sudo rpm --rebuilddb
>>
>> If you previously had a /etc/yum.repos.d/sagemath-f17.repo, please
>> now use http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/sagemath/sagemath-f18.repo
>
> Great stuff. Thank you for your effort.
>
>> There is a Singular update, but the same build should be available
>> as an update in a few days
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Singular-3.1.5-3.fc18
>> and I just opened a bug report to update f18 to the same numpy in rawhide
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896311
>
> In general, how stable is this? Are there tests to verify this is
> working correctly?

  This is a bit outdated and was generated from the f17 build:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/sagemath/test.log
but most of the failures should still happen.

> I ask because I'm planning to mention using sagemath on Fedora as an
> alternative to Wolfram Mathematica to some people on our university,
> and I wouldn't mind using stock sagemath instead of packaged one for
> the time being, until packaged one gets wider testing.

  For the time being I would suggest using the upstream build, or
something like http://aleph.sagemath.org or http://www.sagenb.org

   My goal is to have the package fully reliable. Right now it is
passing roughly 90% of the tests. Most failures are numerical
noise, but there are some serious issues that need to be fixed.

> I'm very grateful for your effort, and having packaged sagemath will
> definitely make deployment and updates easier in the long term, but
> leaving a good initial impression is really important when people are
> exposed to free software.
>
> Regards,
> Vedran

Thanks,
Paulo
_______________________________________________
scitech mailing list
scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/scitech



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux