On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 18:34 -0400, Rich Mattes wrote: > Yeah all of the reviews require catkin to continue, so I blocked them > against the catkin review bug. Sorry about the spam! Hi Rich, I've approved catkin and reviewed a few other ros related packages. I've picked up ones that aren't dependent on others. I'll go up the dep tree from these leaf nodes. I was just wondering if we're going to name the packages ros-fuerte-XXX or not? The current packages are all just python-XXX or just XXX. We'll have quite a lot of trouble if we do groovy later, won't we? Btw, I've been trying to build groovy on my f18 from source. I build the base and the ros-desktop stack, but I'm not sure how well it works. I couldn't get gazebo to work when I compiled it in ROS style. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" Please only print if necessary. Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ robotics mailing list robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
