On 09.03.2011 19:08, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> As I suggested earlier, I'm strict against a catch-all robots-udevrules > > Happy to rename it to something narrower. Can you look at this list > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/11.2.0/Robotics_plan#Test_matrix and help me > figure out how we can refine the name? These robots and boards have a > few things in common: > > - they are usb (some bluetooth) > - they have an education focus > > edurobots-udevrules? That still is way to vague. I suggest creating a package per robot/board/platform/sensor/actuator. If there is a canonical software package for a particular robot, e.g. a library most commonly used to access it, pack the rules in there (examples are libphidget or libunicap). Arduinos are not even robot-specific, so it would be even more terrible to stuff that into this package. There seems to be an arduino package. Having a noarch arduino-udevrules sub-package seems to be the most sensible, or at least a separate package of that name. Please do not try to pocket all kinds of hardware into a single package just because that's they way you use it in your context. Tim -- Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> www.niemueller.de ================================================================= Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein) _______________________________________________ robotics mailing list robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
