On 01/13/2011 05:39 PM, Tim Niemueller wrote: > On 13.01.2011 23:34, Rich Mattes wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Tim Niemueller<tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 13.01.2011 23:12, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: >>>> In anaconda package customization UI, the left column shows categories >>>> (Desktop Environment, Applications, Server ...) and the right column >>>> shows groups of the selected category. >>>> Package groups are organized in comps.xml itself, so there is no need to >>>> change anything in the packages themselves. >>> Ok, Rich, which category is the Robotics Suite in? >>> >>> The package group was just mixed in, I want to propose a package group >>> specific to robot software, we have quite a few packages to which this >>> could apply. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> >> I think we fit best in the Development category. I'm creating a new group >> inside of the development category for our packages, called Robotics Suite, >> which will contain the robotics related stuff. I'm just not sure whether or >> not it makes more sense to list the -devel packages or the base packages for >> our stuff (or both). For instance, should I include player-devel and/or >> player? mrpt-devel and/or mrpt? I'm leaning towards including devel >> packages instead of base ones, since tutorials will probably rely on them at >> some point. > I agree with the category and I suggest to add both, base and devel > packages. > > Tim > > Please have a look at [1] and see if I missed anything. I've been using [2] as a guide on how to do things; the diff is against the f15-comps file. I also went ahead and adjusted the wiki pages. fp.o/wiki/Robotics is now the showcase page, and fp.o/wiki/SIGs/Robotics now holds the old robotics sig page. Rich [1] http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/comps-robotics.diff [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CompsXml _______________________________________________ robotics mailing list robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
