On 13.01.2011 23:34, Rich Mattes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Tim Niemueller<tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 13.01.2011 23:12, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>>> In anaconda package customization UI, the left column shows categories
>>> (Desktop Environment, Applications, Server ...) and the right column
>>> shows groups of the selected category.
>>> Package groups are organized in comps.xml itself, so there is no need to
>>> change anything in the packages themselves.
>>
>> Ok, Rich, which category is the Robotics Suite in?
>>
>> The package group was just mixed in, I want to propose a package group
>> specific to robot software, we have quite a few packages to which this
>> could apply.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
> I think we fit best in the Development category. I'm creating a new group
> inside of the development category for our packages, called Robotics Suite,
> which will contain the robotics related stuff. I'm just not sure whether or
> not it makes more sense to list the -devel packages or the base packages for
> our stuff (or both). For instance, should I include player-devel and/or
> player? mrpt-devel and/or mrpt? I'm leaning towards including devel
> packages instead of base ones, since tutorials will probably rely on them at
> some point.
I agree with the category and I suggest to add both, base and devel
packages.
Tim
--
Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> www.niemueller.de
=================================================================
Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)
_______________________________________________
robotics mailing list
robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
