Hi all, Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on 08/25/2010 9:07:23 AM +0450: Nice to see some non-spam activity again ;)On 8/24/2010 9:36 PM, Tim Niemueller wrote:[...] I fully agree with having the demo program(s) inside the existing upstream projects (or creating an upstream project), since I think it is a better place to maintain such demos. As Tim said, the demo has many areas to advance so it'll (hopefully) become a real project rather than some few lines of code as a trivial package maintained by a package maintainer. I'll think about the questions Tim asked in the last part of his email and answer later :P Good luck, Hedayat As far as the live cd, I think we should obviously plan on including as many of the robotics packages as we can (mrpt, rcss*, opencv,p/s/g, gearbox, fawkes, urg, etc) on top of the base desktop image. We can strip out things like office, games and productivity, but adding the -devel packages and devtools is going to take up quite a bit of space. I'd also like to make sure that all of our packages are aligned with the latest upstream releases, and put a lot of effort into upstreaming any of the changes or enhancements we make. Finally, we should definitely submit it as a Fedora feature once we get our act together; F15/F16 timeframe is probably realistic. Regards, Rich |
_______________________________________________ robotics mailing list robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics