Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251 ------- Additional Comments From alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-05 21:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #175) > Could my last patch be applied? Please? ;) I'm back now. Looking at patch. The devel branch removed the 60-pilot.rules file, was this intended? > For F8, at least people could test in conjunction with the hal and hal-info in > updates-testing. I don't expect there to be any problems. I don't think we need > to wait for anything else from hal/hal-info. > Also a reminder that it fixes documentation for both F8 and F9 which is actively > causing confusion for users and pilot-link maintainers (see the links in comment > #165 ...and another thread has just sprung up on pilot-link-general). > > Fedora enabling libusb by default has foisted this code upon a much larger user > base (for the better, IMHO); this has, as one might expect, exposed some > compatibility regressions. Getting to the root of these problems would be much > easier if we put our packages in order, because at the moment the first > suspicion is - not without basis - broken Fedora config/docs/packaging. Agreed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora-relnotes-content mailing list Fedora-relnotes-content@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-relnotes-content
