Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-05 11:22 EST ------- Could my last patch be applied? Please? ;) For F8, at least people could test in conjunction with the hal and hal-info in updates-testing. I don't expect there to be any problems. I don't think we need to wait for anything else from hal/hal-info. Also a reminder that it fixes documentation for both F8 and F9 which is actively causing confusion for users and pilot-link maintainers (see the links in comment #165 ...and another thread has just sprung up on pilot-link-general). Fedora enabling libusb by default has foisted this code upon a much larger user base (for the better, IMHO); this has, as one might expect, exposed some compatibility regressions. Getting to the root of these problems would be much easier if we put our packages in order, because at the moment the first suspicion is - not without basis - broken Fedora config/docs/packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora-relnotes-content mailing list Fedora-relnotes-content@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-relnotes-content
