Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Use wiki forward instead of tinyurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244924 ------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx 2007-06-24 08:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > However, I'm curious what made you think about this in the first place? That > is, you refer to obfuscation, which has a negative connotation -- as if we are > intentionally trying to hide something. Or is it just that tinyurl.com links > are risky because you don't know where they go, even if you trust the source > that wrote them? I used obfuscation because one cannot see what is behind the tinurl link or whether or not one already knows this. E.g. when there would be instead a link to bugzilla I would know, what I can expect from the link and do not need to follow it. Also I get this information, when I am offline while reading the release notes. Additionally I saw the advantages of using the wiki or some other method and imho using tinyurl in a the release notes looks not very professional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. -- Fedora-relnotes-content mailing list Fedora-relnotes-content@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-relnotes-content
